If “God?( i keep saying God is a title and not a name)” was not perfect then we could not consider him God, i always loved this ““Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

I don't see why you insist on looking on this solely from a religious point of view though, not all of us are religiously inclined.

You must understand that he was not talking about perfection in it's conventional form; it was more than anything else “a self esteem builder, self actualization.” sorta thing.

You out of all people should know that there has to be a balance. As horrendous as this might sound i think wars, racism, hunger and every other “travesty” is just apart of the whole human cycle, they've been arounnd from the beginning of time and they are not going anywhere soon. The only reason you call these “imperfect” is because you grew up hearing it was bad…it does not fall in line with your moral compass, so it's instantly deemed as “bad”, “horrendous”, “terrible” and every other crude word we could find.

You can't question the scriptures now can you? it says “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” that was mentioned in the article; i think that speaks for itself.

If you are to truly understand that article, then you need to take the conventional meaning of “perfection” from your head, only then will you truly get the intended meaning

If “God?( i keep saying God is a title and not a name)” was not perfect then we could not consider him God, i always loved this ““Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

I don't see why you insist on looking on this solely from a religious point of view though, not all of us are religiously inclined.

You must understand that he was not talking about perfection in it's conventional form; it was more than anything else “a self esteem builder, self actualization.” sorta thing.

You out of all people should know that there has to be a balance. As horrendous as this might sound i think wars, racism, hunger and every other “travesty” is just apart of the whole human cycle, they've been arounnd from the beginning of time and they are not going anywhere soon. The only reason you call these “imperfect” is because you grew up hearing it was bad…it does not fall in line with your moral compass, so it's instantly deemed as “bad”, “horrendous”, “terrible” and every other crude word we could find.

You can't question the scriptures now can you? it says “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” that was mentioned in the article; i think that speaks for itself.

If you are to truly understand that article, then you need to take the conventional meaning of “perfection” from your head, only then will you truly get the intended meaning